Serial Bypass Mta
So, im already pissed of all that low/high rank cheaters. It's not more funny.
I would be happy, if you could add a Serial System like in MTA(Multi Theft Auto). Means, if he install the game, a Serial will be added to the PC-Registry, which is not edit/hack able. If he gets banned by FairFight, he can create a new Account, but he can't login because his Serial is banned. Such, if he try's to login, the game 'system' calls up the Serial from the PC-Registry and if its banned, he cant login. How it looks like in Multi Theft Auto: The only way to change the Serial-Code, is to make the complett PC new. Greetings, Drexas. Be prepared for people saying 'It can be easily bypassed.'
There for I'm going to give you my support. I'd be open for any kind of new anti-cheat measure. The more measures you have, the more cheaters you will take down.
(Ofcourse the real tough ones will always find a way around it) However, this system is pretty good because the server provides you with an unique ID/Serial code based on your hardware hardware IDs. Basically changing this code will not work because the server will reject it for not knowing / provided it.
This can be tampered when the cheat developers find out which hardware ID is being used by the server to generate a new code, meaning re-installing the game and tampering the right HWID will still allow you to cheat. But when combined with an IP. Each time a cheater gets banned they will have to do the following steps: - Change IP - Generate / tamper a new HWID - Create a new account Those three steps will make it more time consuming for the tough cheaters, and may even scare some 'scriptkiddies' away because the effort.
It will be the responsibility of Gamersfirst to monitor these actions and try to see behavior patterns in order to update again. It will however ALWAYS Be a cat - mouse game, where the cheat developers are the cat. Not too familiar with how MTO generates the hash, but i'd imagine it would either be unique per install - In which case its just a matter of reinstalling, or deleting that file and running updates or repairs which should download a new one (i'm being lazy in my explanations this morning), or its tied to HWID (Which would probably make more sense), in which case you could bypass it by forcing it to generate a new one whilst spoofing your HWID (Something cheaters already do, quite easily i might add). Unless theres some magical way to force it to be static (Which afaik there isn't, without adopting some questionable big-brother-esque policies), your not changing much. And before people say its more hassle for cheaters, the process could probably be entirely automated and run in a matter of minutes. Your not really adding any more steps.
Change IP - Generate / tamper a new HWID - Create a new account You can do the first two in about a minute. The longest part of that is creating an account, and at this stage it really wouldn't surprise me if they've automated that too. For the most part these days, the cheaters we're seeing crop up are the ones who are dead-set on just attacking the game for their own twisted reasons.
They're not doing it casually and care free, it's their objective. Short of doing some highly illegal things, or pursuing legal recourse as blizzard have done recently, ain't much can be done that isn't already done. Personally, if I were to go with an anti-cheat route, i'd go with a dedicated servers or letting players host their own method that allows owners to host their own anti-cheats. Sure, you'd still get cheaters, but if you blanket it enough you might just get enough of a scatter that its negligible, but i doubt that'd work because it relies on finding good hosts, and opening up the whole server-side-cheats can of worms.
You can do the first two in about a minute. The longest part of that is creating an account, and at this stage it really wouldn't surprise me if they've automated that too. It still requires you to use a different VPN each time. Ofcourse if they start banning the IPs. Free VPNs are mostly slow as hell for gaming and will allow you to play with approax 300ms.
Here you can download Manual N2801 Motherboard for Windows. It's 100% safe! Download drivers and support packages for VIA products on these pages. VIA Embedded Boards and Systems. To obtain BIOS, drivers, BSPs or EVKs for VIA Embedded boards and systems please visit the respective product page you are inquiring about and click on the downloads tab. For older products please search in. Motherboard Drivers are responsible for communication between the varied components in your computer: the processor (CPU), the video card, the hard drives, PCI devices and system memory. Many Motherboard and chipset manufacturers release updates that resolve crucial issues related to system crashes or slow. N2801 motherboard drivers.
Paid VPNs will end up getting banned more and more. Why do so many people act like it's a bad thing to increase anti-cheat measures? Even if it will hold off an additional 5% it's a good thing.
It's not like it costs anything additional other than a few hours to implement this. It still requires you to use a different VPN each time. Ofcourse if they start banning the IPs. Free VPNs are mostly slow as hell for gaming and will allow you to play with approax 300ms.
Paid VPNs will end up getting banned more and more. Why do so many people act like it's a bad thing to increase anti-cheat measures? Even if it will hold off an additional 5% it's a good thing.
It's not like it costs anything additional other than a few hours to implement this. You can change your IP by just resetting your router (Static IP's for households aren't that common anymore). IP bans have pretty much been the standard in bans for the past decade, at least. HWID can be changed through reg-edit if your being clever, but most cheats already have a HWID spoofer to automate the whole thing. Increasing anti-cheat measures isn't necessarily a bad thing, but its the associated dev time to actually build a system and integrate it for something that won't really get much in the way of results, which could otherwise be spent churning out new content or fixing bugs. It's either go big, or go home, and unfortunately there just isn't the tech atm to go big enough for long enough.
Everyone knows about, the customer-friendly service line that handles complaints large and small, which has been. But what about subways and buses? Do riders’ complaints end up registering? Often, the answer is no, it seems. Remember the Metropolitan Transportation Authority board member, David S. Mack, who justified the free use of E-ZPasses and MetroCards by authority board members, saying it encourages them to take the subway and? He said that complaints from average riders are not heeded.
“If you saw something and called it in, it goes right there,” Mr. Mack reportedly told reporters at a committee meeting, kicking a garbage can. His comments — — prompted the City Council’s transportation committee to convene a hearing Thursday on how the authority handles complaints. Christopher P. Boylan, deputy executive director of the authority, testified that there were a number of ways that New Yorkers could complain.
Indeed, there are some 2.3 million complaints received by the M.T.A. Each year, via its Web site, e-mail, regular mail, phone calls, walk-ins and those made directly to transit employees. So here are the ways that your complaints may end up in the circular file.
Phone: There is a toll-free complaint line for buses, 1-888-692-8287; a general non-toll-free number, (718) 330-3322; and an emergency line for the M.T.A. Police Department (1-888-MTA-911-PD), which patrols the authority’s two commuter railroads. Bus complaints are entered into a database and are then forwarded to the relevant depot and department for investigation.
Other subway numbers, and, evidently handle complaints about stations, (718) 243-4637; general subway service complaints, (646) 252-5860; and air conditioning problems, (718) 243-7360. About 2 million people call the general service line — (718) 330-3322 — every year, most of them seeking travel directions and trip planning. Of the remaining complaints, the agency has a goal of responding within 14 to 21 days. Of course, the complaint structure may change with the announced recently. E-Mail: You can through its Web site (which admittedly ).
The authority gets 40,000 e-mail messages a year, which by City Room’s calculations comes to an average of just over 100 a day. To the M.T.A.’s credit, it takes an average of 2.21 days to return e-mails. Snail Mail: People are still writing in with stamps, about 6,000 to 7,000 people a year. Walk-in Centers: Who knew? Has an actual walk-in center to deal with subway and bus issues at 3 Stone Street in Lower Manhattan. Service agents there can deal with MetroCard matters and discounted fare cards. (There are also other complaint centers for the authority’s two railroad lines, one at Grand Central Terminal for the Metro-North Railroad, and one at Pennsylvania Station for the Long Island Rail Road.) Employees: Most importantly of all, perhaps, you can complain to the 70,000 drivers, station managers, track workers and other assorted employees of the M.T.A.
Apparently, they have a systemic way to handle complains up the chain of command. If you want to reach the top of the chain of command yourself, you can even complain to the agency presidents and their senior staff at quarterly Meet and Greets.
Councilman John C. Liu, the Queens Democrat who is chairman of the transportation committee, was unimpressed.
“It’s clear the M.T.A. Has established various avenues through which complaints are received,” he said. “But whether those complaints are actually resolved, and how long it takes to actually resolve them, is painfully unclear.”. I agree with the first poster. It is great that the MTA supposedly gives us different mediums in which to voice our gripes but I am very skeptical as to whether or not they really care about reacting to our issues.
Considering that today alone I was on one line that was heavily delayed and later on a train (on a completely different line) that decided to suddenly go express to ‘speed up service’ and disrupt half of the passengers days, I would assume they already get a tone of complaints and, it would appear, completely ignore them. I am interested to see how the plan to appoint a person in charge of each separate line will work since then there will be competition of sorts to have the best line or lose your job. Right now, however, the fact that the MTA says I can tell a conductor about a complaint doesn’t really fill me with the sense of being taken care of.
Especially since I recently told a conductor that there was an overdosed guy on the train who looked half dead and his response was to shrug, roll up his window, and daydream about his shift being over as he disappeared into the tunnel. Several times over the last year I have emailed the MTA about faulty credit card readers in subway station metro card machines. Even when I provided the serial numbers of specific machines, the MTA responded with the same basic lie again and again: “Mostly the machines are in good repair”. This is simply untrue, if bank atms worked that badly those branches would close.
Once when I asked to know why the uptown westside IRT local had stopped for 20 minutes during evening rush hour, and why there was absolutely no announcement for those waiting at 23rd street, the MTA said they had no record of the delay for that day. Complaints are wasted on the MTA, perhaps if Michael Bloomberg didn’t have a chauffeur drive him to an express stop more would be done about actual conditions in the subway. There should be a way to text message complaints. I arrived at this after being repeatedly ignored by bus drivers who don’t want to stop for one person late at night, or early in the morning, or when you’re hurrying to the door, or well, apparently whenever they feel like it. And with no real schedule to follow they just drive on with impunity.
Using text messages to note the time, route and bus number (as well as possibly receive picture messages) would be quite efficient. Madrid, for example, has bus stops that you can text message to find out where the bus is in relation to the stop you’re. Asking for that here would be too much, I know, but there’s no reason the M.T.A. Couldn’t create a database to collect incoming text messages.
Who knows, maybe one day they could even do something with all that info. I wish that there were an effective way to complain to the M.T.A. About “LONG-TERM” issues, not just about some problem that occurred on that particular day. For instance, I think that a lot of New Yorkers should be complaining to the M.T.A. About the fact that the stations on the Second Avenue Subway will be spaced so far apart, according to the present plans.
I mean, Houston St. To 14th St in “one jump”.
After that, okay, 23rd St. But then, it will jump from 42nd St. To 55th St., and from there to 72nd St.
It will be like an express line on which they forgot to build the local stations. If they can’t afford to build a four-track line, then it would certainly be better to have an “all-local” line than to have an “all-express” line. I’m honestly siding a bit with the MTA on this one. I work for a much, much smaller transit agency probably at least a hundredth the size of the MTA, if not smaller.
But the amount of complaints we get is absolutely staggering. And 90% of them are ‘the bus cut me off’ or ‘the bus passed me at a stop’ (about 90% of those people weren’t even standing at a stop when we investigate) or ‘I didn’t like the way the driver spoke to me.’ At my agency, we investigate almost every single complaint, probably pulling surveillance footage from the busses for at least 50% of them. Probably about 1 in every 5 complaints is legitimate, if that, and for many of them, all we can do is say, ‘sorry’ – they’re not about ongoing issues that we can actually address. I can’t even fathom how the MTA handles the volume of complaints it gets, let alone sorts them into some sort of consolidated form so they can actually identify real problem areas. Not to say they shouldn’t have a process, but I appreciate the scope of the management task it is. I don’t know if making it easier to complain (a la #8’s text message idea) would really help. What they need to do is get a process to consolidate and aggregate complaints into reports that address key areas that need to be worked on.
I’d love to see a quarterly report that identifies the largest source of complaints and offers management’s response. Something more than the occasional subway report card they do. “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore.” VIRAL PROTEST How about a viral protest?
E mail lists? Know anyone in the media? Got mad marketing skills?
I am going to spend the next hour sending it out there. What can it hurt? Can you help?
For you non-US people, know anyone in the US? Because I’d be even more scared of us (get it, US) than ever if I were you. Please feel free to cut and paste: HELP! I’ve gotten a few form letters, occasionally containing free two-trip Metrocards, after sending well-documented complaints to the governor’s office. The most recent occasion was several months ago, when heavy rains and severe flooding pretty much shut down the subway system on one of those rare and dreaded days when I had to go to Manhattan — something I usually avoid like the plague, as readers here may have surmised by some of my previous posts. But on that particular day, I had no choice but to go to Manhattan; and on that very day, the skies parted, and the subway system came to a sloshing halt. (I apologize for any possible karmic connection.) I swiped my card at the first station by Court Square in Queens, only to find as I approached the platform that there was no service.
An MTA employee assured me, however, that I could walk over a few blocks and take the 7 train, which was elevated and which, he assured me, would be running. So I dutifully sloshed, swiped, and again was notified after my card had been charged that there was no service on the line. I eventually hailed a gypsy cab and caught a ride into the city, along with a few other rain-soaked and forlorn refugees; and took a bus from there to my destination (resulting in a third charge on my Metrocard). Upon getting home later in the day, I sent my complaint to then-governor Spitzer’s office.
My complaint wasn’t about the rain or the floods (although one would think they’d have figured out how to keep the system running in the rain after all these years). Nor was I complaining about the system being shut down (last I heard, the MTA had no submarines; so what else could they do once the tracks were flooded?).
Rather, my complaint was that even knowing that the trains weren’t running, MTA continued collecting fares! The service interruption notices were posted after the turnstiles.
Consequently, it was only after having money deducted from their Metrocards that riders were informed that there was no service on those lines. Now consider this: MTA probably deducted several million dollars in fares from people cards that day, knowing full well that they couldn’t provide the services passengers were paying for. They could have prevented this by simply posting the service interruption signs before the turnstiles, but they did not. It’s hard not to read intentionality into this.
So I ask: What would happen if a private business set up shop in NYC, promised to provide a service, collected millions of dollars within a few hours from the public for that service, and then failed to deliver the service? Furthermore, what would happen if it were found that the people running the private business had known all the time that they had no way to deliver the service, but had collected the money anyway? My suspicion is that the principals of that private business would be promptly arrested, tossed in jail, and charged with fraud, grand larceny, and theft by deception.
I also suspect that the state Attorney General would file a lawsuit against that private business within hours; and that half the politicians in the state would be fighting for face time on the evening news that night to denounce that company, promising to pass laws to make sure nothing like that “ever happens again.” But none of that happened. Because the MTA is a government operation; and what is punishable as fraud when committed by private concerns is simply business as usual for government. I complained to the MTA about a bus not stopping at it’s stop in the Parkchester section of the Bronx- the route has the buses go about a block out of their way, so rather than make the right, they just pick people up on that corner, and ignore the proper bus stop entirely.
I e-mailed a note with detailed maps to their website, and left a message with 311. Four days later someone from the MTA got back to me, when she found out that I wasn’t injured by a bus, she pretty much ignored my whole complaint, ending with a “supervisor will get back to you.” Four months later, I went to the same bus stop.
The buses are still missing that stop. Please don’t forget to say nice things to bus drivers, too. If you sit in the front seat for an hour like I did from Ikea to Greenpoint on the B61 last month, I witnessed a good handful of people whining to the driver about things out of his control to the point where I got up and told the old lady to please go sit down. I told the bus driver that he is also appreciated and remain pretty amazed at how well he drives that giant machine down Manhattan Avenue so gracefully. Maybe offer some compliments every now and then, too, is all I am saying. I made a complaint this year about a horribly rude and disrespectful booth attendant at the 8th Ave line 110th St station in Manhattan. The woman, standing outside the booth chatting, was dressed like a homeless person with no ID in sight.
When I requested her name or employee ID number, she told me she was “not put on this earth to answer to me.” The MTA responded to my complaint by saying without her employee ID information they could not act. This is at a station that has only two employees on-duty at any time. How hard could it be for them to identify her??? She is still there every day, although she can more often be seen wandering the neighborhood, talking with locals or at the grocery store nearby, rather than working.
The MTA a monopoly and they just dont care! An interesting idea that the MTA could easily put in place to deal with complaints is to create a Twitter account. For those not familiar with the service, Twitter is a Micro-blogging site that allows you to post your goings-on in 160 character or less chunks.
Propelled by its popularity, Twitter added messaging services, where one twitter message can direct tweets (blog postings) to a specific user, and it has been an interesting guerrilla marketing tool to handle complaints. Comcast, a large cable company that routinely gets voted as having the worst customer service in the industry, is a very famous example, tweets sent to its account get handled promptly, and the entire conversation is posted as a matter of public record. With Twitter now available on a number of mobile avenues, many of the complaints that were mentioned here could be funneled through a Twitter account, and it can be implemented for the cost of having a well-trained employee at a web browser. For example, I could create a tweet like “@nyc-mta I am at the Bx8 bus stop at Randall Ave and Throgs Neck Expy, and the sign is damaged. Can it be replaced?” or “@nyc-mta There is a homeless man sleeping in the fourth car of the uptown 6 train leaving 72nd st” and the rep can easily respond to me with a tweet of her own, asking for more information or following up on service. It’s simple enough where the MTA can start implementing the service as quickly as this week, and effective enough where it can make a difference almost immediately.
On Thursday, Jan 15 2009 I entered the c train subway station at Kingston and Throop heading downtown. It was 11:30 and I had one hour left before catching the last B83 at b’way Junction heading to Starrett City. I swipe my facecard and realize i did not have sufficient funds to cover the fare so i went to the vending machine because the token booth clerk does not handle any money; the attendant was only there to help with anyone in need (so I thought) anyways the vending machines was out of order for farecards other single rides. I needed a card that would give me a transfer to the bus the single ride card was no use to me. I went to the attendant in the burgandy jacket and told her my situation; at this time the train was approaching.
The attendant told me that I had to go to the uptown platform, use the vending machine there and come back. I asked her if she could let me through because the train was coming and I would buy a card at B’way Junction to get on the bus. She rudely again told me no and because this woman in the burgandy jacket wasn’t nice enough to let me through to catch this train, i missed the train and the last B83 bus and had to take an alternate route to get home. Is this what our tax money pay for? Unhelpful rude people sitting in token booths taking up space.I dont need them.Do you? Today, I needed to get on the train with my son in his stroller.
I bought a metrocard and swiped it. Once I got to the service gate, I found it locked. I turned to the station attendant in her booth and asked her to unlock it. She rudely told me to come up and swipe the card in the reader by the booth, I guess to confirm that I swiped, even though she saw me do it.
Serial Bypass Mta Tool
After I did she told me to read the sign on the door next time. The sign reads you have to come up to her first. My point is that she was very rude, and I don’t know why they are not required to be polite to costumers. Second, since they no longer sell anything, and they don’t actually assist anyone on the platform, pressing that button is about the only responsibility.
Serial Bypass Mta Schedule
You’d think she’d be greatful for the strollers that keep her employed.